Pennsylvania Investment Observer
The Promise
of Problems
by Daniel J. Nestlerode
March
25, 2004
The world can
be divided into two general sets: problems and conditions. Conditions
are circumstances to which we must adjust. Death, taxes, rainy
days and flat tires are conditions. Sooner or later we will all
have one or more of these experiences and we have to learn to accept
these circumstances. Problems are of a different set and presume
a solution. People who find solutions to problems are generally
paid a great deal of money and often make a contribution to society
at large. Furthermore, accurately distinguishing between problems
and conditions allows for insights that can lead to impressive
returns.
Problems can be categorized into simple, complex, vexing and
opaque. The simple problem is one you can generally solve or fix
by yourself. Complex problems often require the assistance of another
or the coordination of action with other people in order to arrive
at a resolution. Vexing problems are those that recur, especially
after you believed you had them solved. Finally, opaque problems
are those that you do not recognize as a problem and therefore
you either accept it as a condition or you just ignore it regardless
of the circumstances. This is not a complete taxonomy of problems,
but it is helpful in looking for exception investment opportunities.
One place to look for exceptional investment opportunities in
the stock market is to examine those companies that have fallen
from grace in the markets.
For whatever reason, a number of companies fall on hard times
every year. Within this group are a few gems that are misunderstood
by the investment markets. The crux of a great investment opportunity
is the general misunderstanding by the market of the problems and
conditions with which a company is dealing. Furthermore, a large
part of the investment community never attempts to deal with these
investment opportunities, as they don’t want to be bothered with
idiosyncratic investment research. In the past few years, a few
stunning examples come to mind. Qualcomm designed and developed
a software technology called CDMA or code division multiplexing
for wireless telephone systems. For a number of years the established
telephone companies and wireless cellular phone providers believed
that CDMA was an interesting technology, but was essentially not
workable in the real work. Qualcomm had only computer simulations
to prove that their system worked. Qualcomm was trading around
$50 in 1998, with most of the market believing that CDMA was not
workable. Eighteen months later, the system was proven in the field
and Qualcomm was trading at $200 a share, after a four for one
stock split. Investors who challenged the standard beliefs of wireless
industry were rewarded with a return of 16 times their original
investment. Even after the fall of the tech stocks, these investors
are holding at ten times their original investment made just six
years ago.
The recent fall of the stock market has created a passel of companies
that are priced into bankruptcy. In other words, the market is
saying that these companies will not survive the current economy.
Some of these opportunities have already moved up in price while
others are still trading at bargain basement prices. Two of the
central Pennsylvania winners are Corning Glass and C-Cor.net. Both
companies traded down in the two to three dollar ranges and now
trade over ten dollars per share. Note that not every stock that
trades under five dollars is a great opportunity. Some companies
really do go bankrupt. Furthermore, careful company analysis and
research sometimes misses important issues and turns out to be
less than profitable. Yet, for all the possibilities of an adverse
outcome, the profit potential for misunderstood and miss-priced
securities is enormous. We are currently taking positions in two
companies that are trading around two dollars per share. I will
let you know in future articles how these ventures turn out.
top of page | article archive
|