Pennsylvania Investment Observer
A Few Notions
About Annuities
by Daniel J. Nestlerode
January
2, 2002
In the throws of the current stock market decline, many investors
are buying annuities to protect their principal and earn a seemingly
fair return. Yet, many investors and investment professionals are
falling into a trap that will, perhaps, become the source of investor
dissatisfaction and legal wrangling in the future. Yet, you might
ask, how can a "guaranteed" investment be the source of investor
dissatisfaction? The answer lies in the outcome when the investment
turns out to be something other than what was expected by the investor.
Investor dissatisfaction, it turns out, is usually spurred by unexpectedly
poor investment performance. When the returns do not come from
the markets, some investors turn to the regulators and their lawyers
to help make their portfolios whole. So what are the problems with
annuities?
First, there are no "guaranteed" annuities! Insurance companies
issue annuities. How an annuity performs depends upon how well
the insurance company does with its investments. Simply put, annuity
performance is based on the performance of the underlying investment
portfolio run by the insurance company. The so-called "guarantee" is
based on the issuing insurance company's investment performance.
If the insurance company fails, so do the annuities it issued.
There is no federal insurance backing or guaranteeing any insurance
company or any annuity product. So an annuity doesn't necessarily
protect you the investor, from the performance of the stock market
or failures in the bond market. Furthermore, insurance companies
do fail. Recently Conseco, a large multi-line insurance company
filed for bankruptcy. So when you hear the word guaranteed related
to annuities, pay attention. "Guaranteed" in annuity terms is a
sales tool designed to spur sales. In short, annuities are not
guaranteed in any meaningful way.
Second, you cannot know ahead of time or even after you have
put money into an annuity the risks you are taking. Annuities are
not transparent in terms of disclosure of the underlying investments
that back the annuity. If you cannot know the investment managers,
the investment policies of the insurance company and the portfolio
of investments in which they have committed money, you cannot assess
the risks you are taking making such a purchase. Indeed, most annuities
are blind investment pools, never relating to the purchaser what
they have really bought. You would not buy a car this way. So why
do investors fall for buying blind investment pools? Because they
were told the product was guaranteed! The real question is guaranteed
by whom. The answer is by the issuer. To knowledgeable investors
this is a no pass. In investment terms this means that annuities
are not "transparent".
Third, annuities seemingly offer tax benefits, as the accumulation
within the policy is generally tax-free to the purchaser during
the period when the returns are accumulated in the policy. However,
when the investor wants to spend some of the returns, the purchaser
will pay income tax on the gains in the account. Further, if the
purchaser passes away while owing an annuity, the beneficiary will
be taxed on all of the accumulated earnings from the date the annuity
was purchased as income. There is no step up in tax basis for annuities
for estate purposes!
Fourth, annuities are expensive. Annuities are not investments,
but are insurance products. However, sales people dress up annuities
as investments because they are easier to sell as investments than
as insurance products. The average annuity charges purchasers about
2.25% of his or her investment annually, in addition to sales charges
when the purchase was made. Part of the annual management fee goes
to investment management fees and part is related to the life insurance
on the purchaser. If you pass away the insurance company will pay,
if it is financially able, the annuity beneficiary the current
value of the policy or the face amount of the policy, whichever
is more. In the past few years, this benefit has cost insurance
companies dearly. One large well-known insurance company took a
$700 million loss on annuities sold in the past few years where
the owner had passed away. Annuities are often sold based on this
investment guarantee! If your account is worth less than you have
invested, the insurance company will pay your beneficiaries the
amount you invested. Unless, of course, the insurance company has
filed for bankruptcy in the mean time. Of course, since annuities
have no investment transparency, you won't know if your investment
is in trouble until you file a claim. Too late, as they say. But
I digress. The investment return on annuities is based on the returns
in the bond markets (if the annuity is fixed) or the stock market
(if it is a variable annuity). So, your annuity will pay the gross
returns of the bond or stock market less the cost of the annuity
(5% or more up front) and 2.25% per year forever if you have an
average annuity. In a market that offers 5% on government bonds,
how much can your guaranteed fixed annuity really pay to you? And
if the stock market is falling, how much will your variable annuity
pay to you? The answer is about 3% on fixed annuities backed by
quality bonds. Tell me how the stock market, and I'll hazard a
guess on the performance of your variable annuity.
Now that you understand that you cannot avoid investment risk
by the purchase of annuities and that they are not really a guaranteed
investment, how appealing do annuities seem to you? And if you
do not understand the details of annuities, do you think some policyholders
will file legal actions to recover their investment?
I have analyzed annuities lately by following the money. If you
invest $100,000 in an annuity, many insurance companies offer returns
of 10% on the first year you invest and no deduction for the sales
charge. They are offered commission free. That is why the earnest
agent is sitting in from of your trying to make this sale. Insurance
and investment agents do not sell products for free. Neither do
insurance companies give money away because you, the client, are
such a nice person. Insurance companies make money selling annuities.
Lots of money. So how does the insurance company pay the agent
and give you a return of 10% when no quality investment is paying
over 6 to 7%? First the 10% first year bonus earnings is only paid
if you hold the policy for years and accept your returns as a series
of essentially equal payments. You cannot cancel your annuity after
one year and have a 10% return on your money and your original
purchase price back. The insurance company pays the agent five
percent or more when you buy your policy. This comes out of your
money. So too does the bonus first year return because there is
no other place to get the money. Certainly not from the investment
markets. All returns on annuities come from the investment markets
or are a return of the purchasers funds relabeled as a sales tool
to get you to buy.
These issues and others lead me to believe that in future years
a large group of dissatisfied purchasers of annuities (as investments)
are going to find a good lawyer and file a law suite. Recently
Wall Street agreed to pay over a billion dollars to regulators
for conflicts of interest related to investment research provided
to retail customers. Many individual investor lawsuits are following
the settlements with the regulators. In my thirty-seven years on
Wall Street, we have known all along that "research" issued by
Wall Street firms was really "sales material designed to induce
a transaction". Yet disgruntled regulators and investors hurting
from a falling market are now looking to the courts to help their
investment performance. I am convinced that in the coming years
dissatisfied annuity purchasers are going to look to the courts
to redress shoddy sales practices and misleading claims of "guaranteed" investments.
I have not address all the characteristics of annuities and when
they might be a useful purchase. Clearly there are circumstances
where annuities might be the right purchase. However, they are
not the cure all for a poorly performing stock market.
top of page | article archive
|