Pennsylvania Investment Observer
Tax Relief
by Daniel J. Nestlerode
May 29, 2001
President George W. Bush just got Congress to vote in favor of
the largest tax reduction package since former President Reagan’s
historic tax reduction bill in 1981. I presume that President Bush
will sign this bill into law in the next few days. What followed
the 1981 tax reduction was the beginning the of the great bull market
we have experienced since 1982. While the tax rate reduction in
1981 was not the only element in the recovery of the investment
markets it was, in my opinion, one of the important pieces that
led to the economic recovery after the disastrous Nixon/Carter years.
Despite all the talk about this tax reduction, it is a rather
small and inconsequential tax reduction act. The benefits of this
act are phased in over the next ten years. So if you were looking
for a big reduction in your 2001 taxes, you can forget it. Politicians
being what they are, however, they did throw us a bone they can
take credit for in the next election. If you file your federal taxes
as a single person, then you will probably receive as much as a
$300 refund some time this fall. Single folks filing as head of
households will get as much as a $500 refund and married folks filing
jointly will get up to a $600 refund. The whole notion of the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) sending checks out to nearly every taxpayer,
rather than taking money in is a great idea. Now if I could just
get them to file an annual report telling me what they spent my
money on, I would be more pleased. However, one step at a time is
probably in order. As you can tell, I am not fan of large government,
high tax rates and big tax bills every year.
The marriage penalty tax got some attention in this tax bill.
Starting in 2005, the tax code will be adjusted so that married
couples filing jointly will pay an amount closer to couples living
together and filing singly. I got married in 1999 and was well annoyed,
to put it mildly, at the increase in the amount of money I had to
pay the federal government just because of a change in my marital
status.
The childcare credit will be increasing from $500 per child per
year to $1000 by 2010. This will help my son and his wife pay for
day care for my granddaughter. Let’s see, day care costs $700 per
month and the credit is now $500 a year. Clearly, this is another
bone to appease taxpayers. However, the credit is a country mile
from really handling the city costs of day care. Contributions for
IRA and 401(k) plans are to be increased also. This is great because
now I can put away more money for retirement.
Finally, and most importantly, the inheritance tax is going to
be eliminated by 2010. If you believe that I will tell you another
story. Any bill taking effect now that looks nine years into the
future gives subsequent congresses and administrations ample time
to change their collective minds. Call me a skeptic. However the
intent is great. If we can really eliminate any tax entirely, then
there is hope that the federal tax monster can eventually be brought
under control. Clearly, however, the return of the control of the
Senate to the Democrats (because of the Senator Jeffords switch
to Independent from Republican status) leaves the door open for
the Democrats to chip away at this bill and negate the provisions
that are supposed to take effect in the coming years. With Senator
Hillary Clinton now in charge of the Senate Health Care Committee,
I suspect there will be many spending bills promoted for the good
of hard working Americans, putting the tax cut bill in jeopardy.
What does all this have to do with the investment markets? The
markets generally like tax reductions. Former President Reagan’s
tax rate cuts led to sharply increased government revenues. That’s
right, at these tax rate levels; lower tax rates lead to higher
government revenues. Lower tax rates lead to more economic activity
that results in more money for the taxpayers and the government!
In my book, this is a win-win situation. More economic activity
also means that corporations will be busier and will likely have
more profits. This generally leads to higher stock prices. This
could be a win-win-win situation. The new bull market needs all
the help it can get from congress.
Nevertheless, my gut instinct tells me that the market is not
likely to advance sharply in the months directly ahead. Rallies
in the stock market rarely start in the summer months. More conservatively,
I expect the stock market to mark time this summer and begin a good
rally in the late fall, unless the Democratic Senate submarines
the newly passed tax reduction.
top of page | article archive
|